An overall analysis of weekly farmer sentiment.
Executive Summary The Farmer Happiness Index was 58.6 out of 100 across 4,383 contributions in 290 conversations. Positive language accounted for 53.3%, neutral language 17.8% and negative language 28.9%. Forum-language sentiment was mixed across topics with a predominance of positive tone overall. Conversations ranged from light, social exchanges in livestock threads to more divided, critical …
Executive Summary The Farmer Happiness Index was 57.6 out of 100 across 4,527 contributions in 285 conversations. Positive language accounted for 52.2%, neutral language 17.5% and negative language 30.4%. Discussion mix ranged from practical, light-hearted exchanges in livestock threads to more contested and critical language in political threads, with a majority of forum-language sentiment classified …
Executive Summary The Farmer Happiness Index was 56.2 out of 100 across 4,634 contributions in 262 conversations. Positive language accounted for 50.6%, neutral language 17.5% and negative language 31.9%. Discussion across the supplied forum export is mixed but leans towards constructive and practical exchanges, with a notable presence of supportive banter alongside critical and uncertain …
Executive Summary The Farmer Happiness Index was 55.5 out of 100 across 4,853 contributions in 289 conversations. Positive language accounted for 50.9%, neutral language 15.3% and negative language 33.8%. Week-long forum-language sentiment was broadly positive overall, with a mix of helpful practical exchanges, policy disagreement and some sharply negative threads. Contributors frequently shared application experiences …
Executive Summary The Farmer Happiness Index was 60.0 out of 100 across 4,264 contributions in 279 conversations. Positive language accounted for 54.7%, neutral language 18.5% and negative language 26.9%. The supplied forum export mixes contentious political debate with practical livestock, market and machinery exchanges; some discussions are adversarial and evidence‑challenging while others focus on transactional …
Executive Summary The Farmer Happiness Index was 57.9 out of 100 across 4,441 contributions in 292 conversations. Positive language accounted for 52.6%, neutral language 17.2% and negative language 30.2%. The forum output for the week shows a mix of convivial, market-focused and locally grounded management discussion. Much of the tone is peer-to-peer and solution-seeking, with …
Executive Summary The Farmer Happiness Index was 57.1 out of 100 across 4,750 contributions in 322 conversations. Positive language accounted for 51.5%, neutral language 17.4% and negative language 31.1%. Forum-language across the week mixed operational problem‑solving and community updates with pointed, politically framed exchanges. Contributors alternated between practical sharing (discussion, maps, event reports) and more …
Executive Summary The Farmer Happiness Index was 58.4 out of 100 across 4,416 contributions in 315 conversations. Positive language accounted for 52.4%, neutral language 18.9% and negative language 28.7%. Discussion this week combined practical operational posts, market-focused banter and strongly worded political debate. Contributors in livestock and cropping threads mixed humour and camaraderie with expressions …
Executive Summary The Farmer Happiness Index was 59.5 out of 100 across 4,466 contributions in 309 conversations. Positive language accounted for 54.9%, neutral language 17.8% and negative language 27.3%. Across the forum export the mix of conversation ranges from practical, often wry exchanges about everyday stock and machinery issues to more polarised debates on policy …
Farmer Sentiment Report: 10 Aug – 16 Aug 2026 Executive Summary The overall farmer sentiment this week remains cautiously moderate, with a Farmer Happiness Index of 57.5 out of 100. This indicates a stable, albeit slightly subdued, mood across the farming community compared to previous weeks. Out of 5,615 contributions analyzed, just over half (52.6%) …